Julio Alfredo Ferrer Tamayo
Para responder a tal interrogante, es obligado un previo análisis de la legislación relacionada con el tema, especialmente del Decreto-Ley ·81 del 8 de junio de 1 984, “Sobre el ejercicio de la Abogacía y la Organización Nacional de Bufetes Colectivos”, texto mediante el cual fue creada la Organización Nacional de Bufetes Colectivos (ONBC); estableciendo en su artículo 1 que: “El ejercicio de la abogacía consiste en evacuar consultas y dirigir, representar y defender los derechos de una persona natural o jurídica ante los tribunales de justicia, los órganos de arbitraje y los organismos administrativos en el territorio nacional, así como ante los órganos, organismos y organizaciones extranjeras e internacionales…”, definiendo este propio precepto que: “Son abogados los juristas que ejercen habitualmente la abogacía dentro de la ONBC, sin perjuicio de lo establecido en el inciso a del artículo 4…”, definición esta última que en mi personal modo de ver, entra en contradicción con el concepto que expresa el artículo 2 de dicho Decreto-Ley : “El ejercicio de la abogacía es libre...”, pues tal libertad está limitada o condicionada de manera rígida y excluyente a que la abogacía sea ejercida por juristas miembros de esa organización, condición que es concedida únicamente por su Junta Directiva Nacional, según facultad que le otorga el inciso b del artículo 3, “…ser admitido al ejercicio de la abogacía por la Organización Nacional de Bufetes Colectivos…”, puede un jurista estar capacitado para ejercer la abogacía como lo requiere el inciso a de este último artículo, por título expedido por el centro de educación superior correspondiente en el país, y además reunir condiciones morales adecuadas, no haber sido sancionado por delito intencional que lo haga desmerecer en el concepto público, ni hallarse sujeto a proceso penal por delito de esa naturaleza , pero puede no ser admitido en dicha Organización por decisión de su Junta Directiva Nacional, denegación de ingreso mediante Acuerdo , que es pronunciado sobre la libre apreciación de su máximo órgano de dirección, contra el que sólo le es posible al interesado, interponer Recurso de Queja ante el Ministro de Justicia, única autoridad facultada según el inciso f del artículo 42 de la Resolución #142 del 18 de diciembre de 1984, “Reglamento sobre el ejercicio de la Abogacía y la Organización Nacional de Bufetes Colectivos”, para anular o suspender los acuerdos de la Junta Directiva Nacional que infrinjan las leyes o el Reglamento; pero contra lo resuelto por el Ministro no se da recurso alguno ni en lo administrativo ni en lo judicial. En cuanto a este particular, soy del criterio de que debería franquearse recurso en lo judicial, posibilitando todo acceso a la justicia, como expresión de la efectiva defensa jurídica, que se halla en la base de todo derecho, en cuanto que constituye la última y definitiva garantía de su visibilidad e imparcialidad.
Desde mi punto de vista esto que usted señala da para una denuncia ante la Corte internacional de Justicia. ¿Son ustedes miembros de la World Jurist Association? Pienso que ustedes debieran internacionalizarse por el camino directo creando un, por ejemplo, Colegio de abogados libres de Cuba, o de similar nombre. Con mi mayor aprecio entrego la información suficiente de las actividades de la organización de vuestros colegas que tiene la siguiente dirección:
World Jurist Association
7910 Woodmont Avenue
Suite 1440
Bethesda, Maryland 20814 USA
Phone: 202-466-5428
Fax: 202-452-8540
E-Mail: wja@worldjurist.org
Web: http://www.worldjurist.org
THE WORLD JURIST ASSOCIATION
Highlights and Membership Information
About Us
“A world ruled by law, not force.” This has been the World Jurist Association (WJA)’s mission since its founding in 1963. The WJA was formed in response to an international outcry for a free and open forum where judges, lawyers, law professors and other professionals from around the world could work cooperatively to strengthen and expand the Rule of Law and its institutions through the nations of the world.
As a non-governmental organization with special consultative status at the UN Economic and Social Council, the WJA provides a unique forum for the international community. We have worked closely with governments, non-governmental organizations and international associations to foster a cooperative dialogue on world peace. Through our support, decision-makers from around the world work together as individuals, rather than representatives of a particular country, class or ideology.
With nearly 50 years of accomplishments, the WJA is one of the few organizations working with such a broad range of stakeholders to promote the Rule of Law as the path towards world peace. Our members include sitting and retired Chief Justices, judges, government officials, law professors, lawyers and students from over 140 different countries. We have National Presidents in 85 countries and our Board of Governors represents every continent and aspect of the legal profession.
This brochure is a brief look at the ways in which the WJA has sought to build the foundation for a system of laws that will ensure peace without the use of force. The WJA is committed to its continuation to ensure peace through the Rule of Law for all generations.
Accomplishments
Beginning with the first Congress on the Law of the World, the WJA has achieved many remarkable successes. The congresses continue to provide a forum where individuals from all nations and all areas of the legal profession can gather and exchange ideas and experiences. The results of this dialogue, expressed in the resolutions drafted by each Congress Resolutions Committee and approved by all delegates, is one of the most concrete and enduring accomplishments of the congresses. Every two years, members of the legal profession are given the opportunity to call upon Heads of State and Government to recognize these resolutions and act accordingly. The numerous messages received from these Heads of State and Government, in support and encouragement of the congresses, indicates the value placed upon the resolutions that come out of the Biennial Congress.
The establishment and celebration of World Law Day is another accomplishment of the WJA. President Lyndon Johnson of the United States was the first Head of State to recognize World Law Day. Chief Justice Kisaburo Yokota of Japan, the first Honorary World Chairman of World Law Day, remarked, “The lawyers of the World have marked another important milestone in their struggle toward the great goal of international peace.” Justice Yokota went on to say that World Law Day calls upon the entire world to re-evaluate the place of law in the community of nations and to re-instill in our way of life the rule of law as an ultimate assurance of world peace.
The International Demonstration Trial, another tradition started by the WJA, began in 1971. During the demonstration, hypothetical cases are argued by lawyers from various countries before a panel of Chief Justices of the world. The Demonstration Trials have educated lawyers and laypeople around the world and have shown that law can indeed replace war as the proper forum for decisions of international disputes. The Demonstration Trials give judges a time and place to express their great value to the peace process on a regular biennial basis.
Congresses on the Law of the World
1963 Athens, Greece – Establishment of the World Peace Through Law Center, now known as the World Jurist Association
1965 Washington, DC, USA – The First Celebration of World Law Day
1967 Geneva, Switzerland – Computers and the Law
1969 Bangkok, Thailand – Equal Human Rights for All the Peoples of the World
1971 Belgrade, Yugoslavia – Law, Peace, and the Environment
1973 Abidjan, Ivory Coast – Human Rights
1975 Washington, DC, USA – Women and the Law
1977 Manila, Philippines – Human Rights as Essential to Progress Toward World Peace Under the Rule of Law
1979 Madrid, Spain – Human Rights Progress in Furthering World Peace Through Law
1981 São Paolo, Brazil – The Rule of Law: A Concept of Universal Principles
1983 Cairo, Egypt – Universal Legal Principles as a Basis for World Peace
1985 West Berlin, Germany – Peace with Justice in the World Community
1987 Seoul, Korea – The Contributions of Law to World Peace
1990 Beijing, China – Law for World Peace and Development
1991 Barcelona, Spain – Law and Preservation of Peace
1993 Manila, Philippines – Law in a Changing World
1995 Montreal, Canada – Law in the Global Community
1997 Doha, Qatar – Law and Development in the Pursuit of Peace
1999 Budapest, Hungary & Vienna, Austria – World Peace in the 21st Century: Strengthening the Rule of Law in All Nations
2001 Dublin, Ireland & Belfast, Northern Ireland – Friendship, Cooperation and the Rule of Law: Building the Spirit of World Peace
2003 Sydney & Adelaide, Australia – World Peace through the Rule of Law: Celebrating 40 Years of the WJA
2005 Beijing & Shanghai, China – Rule of Law and Harmony of International Society
2009 Kiev, Ukraine – The Supremacy of Law as a Guarantee for the Protection of World Peace and Human Rights
Este no conoce cuales son los problemas de acceso a la abogacía en el mundo. Además, no cuenta su historia de fullero y corrupto, por lo que fue bochornosamente separado de la abogacía. ahora de fre land por La Habana